“It’s not who you know, it is what you know”.
In an ideal world the next ten years will see the opportunity for students to get jobs to be based not on their connections, but on their qualifications and personality. It will be based on them as a person, not who their father or mother is, or who they work for. To be frank, this information should be irrelevant.
I strongly believe that people should make their own way in their careers, and stop relying on wealthy peers to get them a job. The class system that we live in today should not mean that the wealthier students and people applying for jobs can automatically get a job, yet it does. As LinkedIn said in this decade, in 2016, 70% of people in their survey got a job in a firm because they already knew someone working there. Whether this is a family member or a friend, this is wrong. If their uncle works in a managerial position for Google then they should not automatically gain professional employment there. By all means they should apply, but the approach to their application should be equal in comparison to all other applicants, this is only fair and just.
As LinkedIn said in this decade, in 2016, 70% of people in their survey got a job in a firm because they already knew someone working there
Ideally, this system of entering work would completely eliminate the bias issue of people getting jobs because of who they know. But we do not live in a fairy tale, we live in a reality where the best that can happen is that policies accumulate and new opportunities open for students who would otherwise not get the same chances as other student when applying for jobs. It is a hard system to combat, and the policies implemented should be done so with great care and consideration. While a more rigorous interview technique would prevent people from getting a job based on who they know, this may equally deter the less confident students from applying. Therefore, there needs to be some thought put in to what policy could be successful to combat this issue, but our system of employment needs to be updated and balanced.
Post Views:
704
class comment Equality interviews job market Justice
Last modified: 4th December 2019
10 year forecast: social justice – will the job market ever be fair?
“It’s not who you know, it is what you know”.
In an ideal world the next ten years will see the opportunity for students to get jobs to be based not on their connections, but on their qualifications and personality. It will be based on them as a person, not who their father or mother is, or who they work for. To be frank, this information should be irrelevant.
I strongly believe that people should make their own way in their careers, and stop relying on wealthy peers to get them a job. The class system that we live in today should not mean that the wealthier students and people applying for jobs can automatically get a job, yet it does. As LinkedIn said in this decade, in 2016, 70% of people in their survey got a job in a firm because they already knew someone working there. Whether this is a family member or a friend, this is wrong. If their uncle works in a managerial position for Google then they should not automatically gain professional employment there. By all means they should apply, but the approach to their application should be equal in comparison to all other applicants, this is only fair and just.
Ideally, this system of entering work would completely eliminate the bias issue of people getting jobs because of who they know. But we do not live in a fairy tale, we live in a reality where the best that can happen is that policies accumulate and new opportunities open for students who would otherwise not get the same chances as other student when applying for jobs. It is a hard system to combat, and the policies implemented should be done so with great care and consideration. While a more rigorous interview technique would prevent people from getting a job based on who they know, this may equally deter the less confident students from applying. Therefore, there needs to be some thought put in to what policy could be successful to combat this issue, but our system of employment needs to be updated and balanced.
Share this article on:
class comment Equality interviews job market Justice
Last modified: 4th December 2019
You might also like
Why the ‘Christmas Advert’ should not be celebrated
by Kayleigh Fraser• 4th December 2020
The yearly Christmas adverts have managed to ingrain themselves as a cultural British symbol. They mark the end of the year, celebrations of the festive season and the long...
Decrease in internships and placements due to COVID-19
by Lenka Minarovicova• 23rd November 2020
Lenka Minarovicova looks into the pandemic's effects on internships and placements...
Feminist figures in fashion
by Natalie Finnigan• 22nd November 2020
Natalie Finnigan shows how three powerful feminist icons are making a difference within the fashion and beauty industries. ...
City Council issue Annual Equality Report
by Alicia Curry• 22nd November 2020
Alicia Curry on Newcastle City Council's Annual Equality Report...
Trump: What’s his next move?
by Kayleigh Fraser• 16th November 2020
With a sweeping majority of 306 electoral votes to Trump’s 232, Joe Biden took the US by storm to win the 2020 election. But, what does this mean for Donald Trump? What will...
Rent Strike‽
by Eve Brennan• 13th November 2020
Students across the country, in Manchester, Bristol and Glasgow, to name a few, are participating in rent strikes to protest their continuing payment of rent and tuition fees...
Previous Story
10 year forecast: ClimateNext Story
Biggest Stories of the Decade – The downing of flight MH-17