Many labour party members have criticised the labour leadership
candidate over her response to a pledge card asking her whether she’d agree to
expelling leader members who belong to anti-trans groups, such as Woman’s Place
UK. However, her response was arguably only polarising because she said that
she had to take time to think it over before she signed the pledge, due to how
the card was phrased.
She also raised a valid point about the use of pledge cards
in campaigns and how they are often phrased so that they pit groups of people
against each other. This is obviously counter-intuitive to someone who wants to
get people to vote for them, as they need to appeal to a large selection of prospective
voters.
Clearly, there is an issue with these pledge cards, and it
is simply bad luck that Nandy had to take time on this one, despite her obviously
believing in Trans rights, as she later responded that “anyone who identifies as
a woman” should be able to run in all-women groups.
So, I without a doubt believe that this slip-up was simply just unfortunate circumstances, and not, as some suggest, subtle transphobia, or her trying to appeal to all potential voters.
She has shown those in the trans community that she views them as being valid and that they deserve a safe space within politics.
She also remarked that she wouldn’t back the removal of whole organisations from politics, but instead would operate on an individual basis, based on bigoted behaviour, that members of the Labour party exhibit.
For some this may not be enough, but for me, it has shown
that she is willing to stand with our trans brothers and sisters, and will
protect their rights, and their safety.
Post Views:
666
Labour election lisa nandy Pledge card politics Trans rights
Last modified: 5th March 2020
Lisa Nandy: Screamer of trans rights, or clever politician?
Many labour party members have criticised the labour leadership candidate over her response to a pledge card asking her whether she’d agree to expelling leader members who belong to anti-trans groups, such as Woman’s Place UK. However, her response was arguably only polarising because she said that she had to take time to think it over before she signed the pledge, due to how the card was phrased.
She also raised a valid point about the use of pledge cards in campaigns and how they are often phrased so that they pit groups of people against each other. This is obviously counter-intuitive to someone who wants to get people to vote for them, as they need to appeal to a large selection of prospective voters.
Clearly, there is an issue with these pledge cards, and it is simply bad luck that Nandy had to take time on this one, despite her obviously believing in Trans rights, as she later responded that “anyone who identifies as a woman” should be able to run in all-women groups.
So, I without a doubt believe that this slip-up was simply just unfortunate circumstances, and not, as some suggest, subtle transphobia, or her trying to appeal to all potential voters.
She also remarked that she wouldn’t back the removal of whole organisations from politics, but instead would operate on an individual basis, based on bigoted behaviour, that members of the Labour party exhibit.
For some this may not be enough, but for me, it has shown that she is willing to stand with our trans brothers and sisters, and will protect their rights, and their safety.
Share this article on:
Labour election lisa nandy Pledge card politics Trans rights
Last modified: 5th March 2020
You might also like
Trump: What’s his next move?
by Kayleigh Fraser• 16th November 2020
With a sweeping majority of 306 electoral votes to Trump’s 232, Joe Biden took the US by storm to win the 2020 election. But, what does this mean for Donald Trump? What will...
Is Boris Johnson cherry picking data to control us?
by Shreya Dube• 14th November 2020
Shreya Dube unpicks the notorious cherry picking of COVID-19 data to dazzle the public ...
Why can’t we be friends? The political divide on-campus
by Oren Brown• 3rd November 2020
Oren Brown considers why it might be tricky to be friends with someone who has different political views...
Trump doesn’t deserve any sympathy for catching COVID
by Thomas Dickson• 15th October 2020
Thomas Dickson discusses whether the President of the US deserves sympathy for catching COVID...
Tier 2 restrictions set to replace local lockdown rules in Newcastle
by Joe Molander• 12th October 2020
Joe Molander on the new lockdown system announced today...
Why we panic buy
by Maud Webster• 6th October 2020
Maud Webster unpacks the reasons why we panic buy....
Previous Story
The case of Yolanda Bonnell: Should everyone really be a critic?Next Story
Why social media is bad for political discourse