Hungary has recently attracted global media attention following
Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s announcement to introduce generous financial
incentives to promote the country’s population growth.
In a state of the nation address on 10 February, Orban announced a range of new benefits offered by the government, including guaranteeing that women with four or more children will never have to pay income tax, offering cheap mortgages to families buying new homes and promising cheap loans and a lifetime exemption from income tax for married younger under 40. In a move divergent from sustainability policy in many other countries, he also announced that the government would subsidise £6850 towards the purchase of seven-seater vehicles for families with three or more children.
These policies are all aimed at raising Hungary’s birth rates to
reverse population decline , with Orban hoping to reach a fertility rate of 2.1
by 2030. An analysis of Hungary’s demographics is necessary to see whether Orban’s
measures are justified. As of 2017, Hungary has a fertility rate of 1.50, which
actually shows a substantial rise from previous years; there has been a
sustained year-on-year increase in fertility rate since 2011 when the rate was
1.23, the lowest on record, presumably in the aftermath of the financial
crisis. Records suggest a very gradually ageing population, which is something
reflected across many developed countries globally, and thus, despite the rise
in fertility rate, Hungary has seen a considerable fall in total population
from 9,850,845 in 2017 to 9,825,704 in 2018.
While Orban’s policies seem incredibly generous, it appears that
government officials don’t expect the population to take up these offers all
too easily; the government estimates this umbrella of policies will cost the
state $500m, or 0.3% of GDP, in 2020, which seems surprisingly low considering
the vast financial benefits on offer. This ultimately reflects Hungary’s
benefit system prior to the introduction of these new policies; currently there
is already a broad range of family benefits on offer, which have ultimately
seen only limited success.
Orban has a clear anti-immigration stance, even arguing that
“immigration means surrender” and heavily criticising the EU. This is reflected
in the results of a microcensus from 2016; 98.3% of the Hungarian population is
of Hungarian nationality. Arguably his beliefs echo those of many other who similarly
oppose globalisation and the influx of workers and students that it brings;
thank God he isn’t planning on building a wall. However, by discouraging
immigration he is limiting Hungary’s economic development. Furthermore, simply
introducing generous financial subsidies does not target the root of the
problem. Orban should instead be focusing on why people don’t want to have
further children, rather than simply paying them to do so. By focusing on the
economic incentives for childbearing, he is not addressing any core structural
problems in his country which may additionally be contributing to the problem.
Increasing the fertility rate is of little impact when many of them simply grow
up to emigrate to other countries, thus facilitating the development of an
infamous brain drain in Hungary. Why encourage a higher birth rate if the job
market and university system are not attractive enough to actually retain these
children as they grow up?
Ultimately people are questioning the morality of a system which
so strongly encourages having children for financial benefits. Will these
children grow up happy with parents who were tempted by the offer of subsidies
on cars and cheaper mortgages? Only time will tell, but recent opinion polls
suggest that Orban and his team will remain in power for a while yet; Orban
faces elections later this year following unrest and protests against their
rule, but these polls suggest that his party will win close to 40% of the
popular vote, leaving it in a much more favourable position than many of its
rivals.
Post Views:
248
#Hungary birth rate orban policy population growth viktor
Last modified: 29th March 2020
Editor-in-Chief of the Courier 2019/20, News Editor 2018/19, writer since 2016 and German & Business graduate. I've written for all of our sections, but particularly enjoy writing breaking news and data-based investigative pieces. Best known in the office for making tea and blasting out James Blunt. Twitter: @graceldean
Should Hungary be funding population growth?
Hungary has recently attracted global media attention following Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s announcement to introduce generous financial incentives to promote the country’s population growth.
In a state of the nation address on 10 February, Orban announced a range of new benefits offered by the government, including guaranteeing that women with four or more children will never have to pay income tax, offering cheap mortgages to families buying new homes and promising cheap loans and a lifetime exemption from income tax for married younger under 40. In a move divergent from sustainability policy in many other countries, he also announced that the government would subsidise £6850 towards the purchase of seven-seater vehicles for families with three or more children.
These policies are all aimed at raising Hungary’s birth rates to reverse population decline , with Orban hoping to reach a fertility rate of 2.1 by 2030. An analysis of Hungary’s demographics is necessary to see whether Orban’s measures are justified. As of 2017, Hungary has a fertility rate of 1.50, which actually shows a substantial rise from previous years; there has been a sustained year-on-year increase in fertility rate since 2011 when the rate was 1.23, the lowest on record, presumably in the aftermath of the financial crisis. Records suggest a very gradually ageing population, which is something reflected across many developed countries globally, and thus, despite the rise in fertility rate, Hungary has seen a considerable fall in total population from 9,850,845 in 2017 to 9,825,704 in 2018.
While Orban’s policies seem incredibly generous, it appears that government officials don’t expect the population to take up these offers all too easily; the government estimates this umbrella of policies will cost the state $500m, or 0.3% of GDP, in 2020, which seems surprisingly low considering the vast financial benefits on offer. This ultimately reflects Hungary’s benefit system prior to the introduction of these new policies; currently there is already a broad range of family benefits on offer, which have ultimately seen only limited success.
Orban has a clear anti-immigration stance, even arguing that “immigration means surrender” and heavily criticising the EU. This is reflected in the results of a microcensus from 2016; 98.3% of the Hungarian population is of Hungarian nationality. Arguably his beliefs echo those of many other who similarly oppose globalisation and the influx of workers and students that it brings; thank God he isn’t planning on building a wall. However, by discouraging immigration he is limiting Hungary’s economic development. Furthermore, simply introducing generous financial subsidies does not target the root of the problem. Orban should instead be focusing on why people don’t want to have further children, rather than simply paying them to do so. By focusing on the economic incentives for childbearing, he is not addressing any core structural problems in his country which may additionally be contributing to the problem. Increasing the fertility rate is of little impact when many of them simply grow up to emigrate to other countries, thus facilitating the development of an infamous brain drain in Hungary. Why encourage a higher birth rate if the job market and university system are not attractive enough to actually retain these children as they grow up?
Ultimately people are questioning the morality of a system which so strongly encourages having children for financial benefits. Will these children grow up happy with parents who were tempted by the offer of subsidies on cars and cheaper mortgages? Only time will tell, but recent opinion polls suggest that Orban and his team will remain in power for a while yet; Orban faces elections later this year following unrest and protests against their rule, but these polls suggest that his party will win close to 40% of the popular vote, leaving it in a much more favourable position than many of its rivals.
Share this article on:
#Hungary birth rate orban policy population growth viktor
Last modified: 29th March 2020
You might also like
What will tonight’s outcome mean for America, and for the world?
by multiple writers• 3rd November 2020
With the 2020 US election now upon us, Our writers look at the ramifications both outcomes would have on both America and international politics. A Biden Win – Callum...
‘Either late, or just plain wrong’: The Government Response to COVID-19
by multiple writers• 22nd June 2020
The UK Government’s response to Coronavirus is rather like a night out in Soho. Absurdly late, full of embarrassing stumbles, and causing long-lasting damage. Unfortunately, the...
What does the government’s new coronavirus slogan actually mean?
by Kristina Flexman• 17th May 2020
Seven weeks into lockdown, just as the nation was acclimatising, Boris Johnson skyrocketed the turbulence among society and the media. The nation’s slogan evaporated, as Boris...
Hungary for adventure?
by Madeleine Raine• 9th May 2020
Madeleine Raine looks back on her trip to Budapest. The last country she visited before the UK went into a nationwide lock-down....
Viktor Orbán: are we really surprised?
by Alex Walker• 19th April 2020
Alex Walker examines Orbán's ascent to power, how he's managed it and how we failed to stop it ...
The chilling rise of Viktor Orbán
by Faye Navesey• 19th April 2020
Faye Navesey on the Hungarian Prime Minister's recent consolidation of power...
Previous Story
Antisocial media: Is Instagram’s pledge to remove graphic images of self-harm enough for vulnerable young people?Next Story
Is student mental health at breaking point? Alexandra Sadler discusses whether universities are doing enough to tackle the mental health crisisAbout the Author: Grace Dean