The lecture capture system, ReCap, is popular among Russell Group universities. Here, at Newcastle, ReCap is provided across the majority of lectures, though (and perhaps controversially) staff have the option to cancel recordings at their discretion. This ‘opt-out’ policy is the source of much debate.
At first glance, ReCap is immensely useful. An amazing revision tool and especially for auditory learners, it can be used at any time and any place. Recap is also a lifeline for students with disabilities, chronic illnesses and mental health issues that prevent consistent attendance, allowing students to catch up on any content they may have missed. In fact, in a recent study, 85% of students with disabilities use the system frequently as a revision resource. Keeping this in mind, the fact that lecturers can pull the plug on Recap recordings without any notice appears unfair on those who can’t attend for genuine reasons or struggle to maintain the high levels of concentration required for long days on campus. After all, life is messy. You never know what it might throw at you. Despite this, we all seem to know someone who sacks off their lectures for an extra hour in bed. In my opinion, the people who take advantage of ReCap do merit concerns about overall lecture attendance. This trivial use of lecture recordings can be interpreted as a slight or disrespect to lecturers whose job it is to be there in person to provide the course content. Additionally, ReCap’s use raises issues surrounding intellectual property rights. As at the end of the day, the study material does belong to your lecturer. With only 67% of the students surveyed satisfied with ReCap, there is definitely more to be done to improve the service. Occasionally, there are no recordings provided during crucial weeks and sometimes the recordings have poor quality audio. Ultimately, ReCap should be considered a necessity for those who strongly rely on it and a complementary tool for those who might not.
The petition demands that students receive "recognition, support and representation from Newcastle City Council, Newcastle University and private accommodation"...
Maud Webster discusses how the move to online learning may pave the way for a more inclusive style of teaching in the future, something which may not have been reached without the...
University students are being effected by coronavirus in a multitude of ways, both in and out of university. People all over the world are calling for rent freezes or even rent...
To Recap or not to Recap?
The lecture capture system, ReCap, is popular among Russell Group universities. Here, at Newcastle, ReCap is provided across the majority of lectures, though (and perhaps controversially) staff have the option to cancel recordings at their discretion. This ‘opt-out’ policy is the source of much debate.
At first glance, ReCap is immensely useful. An amazing revision tool and especially for auditory learners, it can be used at any time and any place. Recap is also a lifeline for students with disabilities, chronic illnesses and mental health issues that prevent consistent attendance, allowing students to catch up on any content they may have missed. In fact, in a recent study, 85% of students with disabilities use the system frequently as a revision resource.
Keeping this in mind, the fact that lecturers can pull the plug on Recap recordings without any notice appears unfair on those who can’t attend for genuine reasons or struggle to maintain the high levels of concentration required for long days on campus. After all, life is messy. You never know what it might throw at you.
Despite this, we all seem to know someone who sacks off their lectures for an extra hour in bed. In my opinion, the people who take advantage of ReCap do merit concerns about overall lecture attendance. This trivial use of lecture recordings can be interpreted as a slight or disrespect to lecturers whose job it is to be there in person to provide the course content. Additionally, ReCap’s use raises issues surrounding intellectual property rights. As at the end of the day, the study material does belong to your lecturer.
With only 67% of the students surveyed satisfied with ReCap, there is definitely more to be done to improve the service. Occasionally, there are no recordings provided during crucial weeks and sometimes the recordings have poor quality audio. Ultimately, ReCap should be considered a necessity for those who strongly rely on it and a complementary tool for those who might not.
Featured Image: Newcastle University
Share this article on:
#University lectures recap
Last modified: 20th November 2019
You might also like
An open letter to lecturers using Zoom
by Alex Walker• 26th October 2020
Alex Walker offers a few words of advice on Zoom etiquette ...
Online teaching and the student experience
by Joseph Caddick• 7th June 2020
Lectures next year are moving online. Joseph Caddick discusses how this will affect teaching, learning and mental health....
Durham online learning plans reversed
by Sophie Wilson• 25th April 2020
Sophie Wilson describes how the idea of Durham University moving more to online learning is not progressing any further. ...
Sabbatical officers launch rent refund petition
by Grace Dean• 21st April 2020
The petition demands that students receive "recognition, support and representation from Newcastle City Council, Newcastle University and private accommodation"...
COVID-19 could make universities more inclusive
by Maud Webster• 15th April 2020
Maud Webster discusses how the move to online learning may pave the way for a more inclusive style of teaching in the future, something which may not have been reached without the...
Student rent should be frozen due to COVID-19
by Grace Piercy• 11th April 2020
University students are being effected by coronavirus in a multitude of ways, both in and out of university. People all over the world are calling for rent freezes or even rent...
Previous Story
Time to close the blinds on Fenwick’s Christmas window?Next Story
Is PEC a pain in the neck?