On the 26th of October 2019, ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi committed suicide in Syria by detonation of a suicide vest. While in light of the atrocities that ISIS caused around the world, particularly summer of 2018, this can be considered great news, the damage the US military (funded by the UK government as well) has done in Iraq and Syria over the past couple of years cannot be disregarded.
It would be wrong to overlook these damages just because the ISIS leader is now dead. Yes, their main goal has now been achieved. However, the means to get to that goal caused a series of bloodshed, bereaved families, and fundamentally, left a country in terrible shape and condition.
Yes, the main leader is dead, but the teachings, the idealism, and the doctrine still remain
Furthermore, the death of the ISIS leader does not even guarantee the end of ISIS. Yes, the main leader is dead, but the teachings, the idealism, and the doctrine still remain. That in itself will never die, and as long as there are people out there who agree with this doctrine, IS will never truly be dead.
Despite the masses of bloodshed, it is important to know that ISIS did not only terrorise internationally; their own country too saw great terror. The fear that one of your relatives will suddenly want to join ISIS, ripping your family apart in the process, or the fear that your home could be blown up in the name of honour and integrity. Military intervention not only benefitted the rest of the world, but the inhabitants of the country too (obviously not completely, but to an extent).
This is definitely not a black and white argument, but the defeat of the IS leader sheds a light of hope, both internationally and locally. However, I do believe that the US and UK governments must help Iraq and Syria rebuild their countries, they are the ones that tore it down in the first place.
Joe Molander’s take on intervention can be found here: http://courierbackup.nusumoodle.co.uk/the-long-game-should-we-have-intervened-over-isis/
Post Views:
768
comment government iraq ISIS PEACE politics Syria war
Last modified: 7th November 2019
Was military intervention into ISIS necessary?
On the 26th of October 2019, ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi committed suicide in Syria by detonation of a suicide vest. While in light of the atrocities that ISIS caused around the world, particularly summer of 2018, this can be considered great news, the damage the US military (funded by the UK government as well) has done in Iraq and Syria over the past couple of years cannot be disregarded.
It would be wrong to overlook these damages just because the ISIS leader is now dead. Yes, their main goal has now been achieved. However, the means to get to that goal caused a series of bloodshed, bereaved families, and fundamentally, left a country in terrible shape and condition.
Furthermore, the death of the ISIS leader does not even guarantee the end of ISIS. Yes, the main leader is dead, but the teachings, the idealism, and the doctrine still remain. That in itself will never die, and as long as there are people out there who agree with this doctrine, IS will never truly be dead.
Despite the masses of bloodshed, it is important to know that ISIS did not only terrorise internationally; their own country too saw great terror. The fear that one of your relatives will suddenly want to join ISIS, ripping your family apart in the process, or the fear that your home could be blown up in the name of honour and integrity. Military intervention not only benefitted the rest of the world, but the inhabitants of the country too (obviously not completely, but to an extent).
This is definitely not a black and white argument, but the defeat of the IS leader sheds a light of hope, both internationally and locally. However, I do believe that the US and UK governments must help Iraq and Syria rebuild their countries, they are the ones that tore it down in the first place.
Joe Molander’s take on intervention can be found here: http://courierbackup.nusumoodle.co.uk/the-long-game-should-we-have-intervened-over-isis/
Share this article on:
comment government iraq ISIS PEACE politics Syria war
Last modified: 7th November 2019
You might also like
Why the ‘Christmas Advert’ should not be celebrated
by Kayleigh Fraser• 4th December 2020
The yearly Christmas adverts have managed to ingrain themselves as a cultural British symbol. They mark the end of the year, celebrations of the festive season and the long...
Mosul review: A functional action film that tells an important story
by George Cochrane• 30th November 2020
George Cochrane reviews Iraq-set war film Mosul...
300 signatures to make misogyny a hate crime
by Kate Lovell• 26th November 2020
Kate Lovell summarises the letter sent by It Happens Here, a society seeking to campaign against sexual violence in the city, to the local Police and Crime Commissioner to make...
Students in University-owned accommodation eligible for partial rent refund
by Elsa Tarring• 20th November 2020
Elsa Tarring reports on the latest news on travelling home for Christmas ...
Trump: What’s his next move?
by Kayleigh Fraser• 16th November 2020
With a sweeping majority of 306 electoral votes to Trump’s 232, Joe Biden took the US by storm to win the 2020 election. But, what does this mean for Donald Trump? What will...
Is Boris Johnson cherry picking data to control us?
by Shreya Dube• 14th November 2020
Shreya Dube unpicks the notorious cherry picking of COVID-19 data to dazzle the public ...
Previous Story
How to blunt the lethal blade of knife crimeNext Story
Molly Russell’s legacy: How the death of the 14-year-old could help to protect the lives of hundreds of others