Last week, the Liberal Democrat party revealed their new plans for lifelong learning: a £10,000 ‘skills wallet’. This proposed skills wallet would be distributed to adults in three phases; firstly, all adults in the UK would be entitled to £4,000 at 25, then £3,000 at 40, and a further £3,000 at 55. This money, the party argue, will be spent on eligible educational and training courses, and funding will derive from a reversal of the corporation tax which was lowered from 20% to 17% under the Tory government.
As much as I approve of this increased tax, the fact that the Lib Dems aren’t considering spending this on a) a subsidy / removal of university tuition fees or b) increased funding in primary and secondary education is frustrating. Whilst I appreciate the immense benefits that investing in lifelong education can offer, surely it makes more sense to set people up from a younger age with a good education system that instills a love of learning before they reach adulthood?
Furthermore, the seemingly unrestricted nature of the ‘skills wallet’ causes more concerns as the grants will be given to every adult regardless of income. This juxtaposes both the Labour and Tory proposals for lifelong learning. Labour is targeting 300,000 eligible adults with the offer of free educational and vocational courses, while the Tories are expanding their National Retraining Scheme to retrain adults whose jobs are at risk of being replaced by automation.
With all adults being entitled to the scheme, £1-2 billion of allocated funding could go to the wealthiest of society – shouldn’t the money be targeted and allocated more to those who actually need the funding? Additionally, with the absence of a maintenance loan for Further Education courses, people with responsibilities such as dependent children, or a lack of time due to full time work, will not be able to use the funding.
Thus, if the Lib Dems can iron out these extensive creases in their plans then their proposed ‘skills wallet’ could have some potential. However, in its current state I feel that the proposals are largely problematic and socially divisive.
Post Views:
1,250
education election Liberal Democrats policy politics
Last modified: 26th November 2019
Second year Architecture & Urban Planning student at Newcastle University; also interested in literature and environmental studies. Arts sub-editor for the 20/21 academic year.
Why the Lib Dems’ ‘Skills Wallets’ would fail
Last week, the Liberal Democrat party revealed their new plans for lifelong learning: a £10,000 ‘skills wallet’. This proposed skills wallet would be distributed to adults in three phases; firstly, all adults in the UK would be entitled to £4,000 at 25, then £3,000 at 40, and a further £3,000 at 55. This money, the party argue, will be spent on eligible educational and training courses, and funding will derive from a reversal of the corporation tax which was lowered from 20% to 17% under the Tory government.
As much as I approve of this increased tax, the fact that the Lib Dems aren’t considering spending this on a) a subsidy / removal of university tuition fees or b) increased funding in primary and secondary education is frustrating. Whilst I appreciate the immense benefits that investing in lifelong education can offer, surely it makes more sense to set people up from a younger age with a good education system that instills a love of learning before they reach adulthood?
Furthermore, the seemingly unrestricted nature of the ‘skills wallet’ causes more concerns as the grants will be given to every adult regardless of income. This juxtaposes both the Labour and Tory proposals for lifelong learning. Labour is targeting 300,000 eligible adults with the offer of free educational and vocational courses, while the Tories are expanding their National Retraining Scheme to retrain adults whose jobs are at risk of being replaced by automation.
With all adults being entitled to the scheme, £1-2 billion of allocated funding could go to the wealthiest of society – shouldn’t the money be targeted and allocated more to those who actually need the funding? Additionally, with the absence of a maintenance loan for Further Education courses, people with responsibilities such as dependent children, or a lack of time due to full time work, will not be able to use the funding.
Thus, if the Lib Dems can iron out these extensive creases in their plans then their proposed ‘skills wallet’ could have some potential. However, in its current state I feel that the proposals are largely problematic and socially divisive.
Share this article on:
education election Liberal Democrats policy politics
Last modified: 26th November 2019
You might also like
What I want white students to understand, as a ‘BAME’ student
by Tiyanna Mistry• 24th November 2020
Tiyanna Mistry on the importance of white students showing up and lending their support...
Biden’s election: Will the planet thank America for its choice?
by Sophie Wilson• 20th November 2020
Sophie Wilson gives her opinion on what the recent US election result will mean for the climate crisis...
Tackling racism in the medical field
by Sophie Wilson• 19th November 2020
Sophie Wilson dissects the truth behind medical racism ...
Trump: What’s his next move?
by Kayleigh Fraser• 16th November 2020
With a sweeping majority of 306 electoral votes to Trump’s 232, Joe Biden took the US by storm to win the 2020 election. But, what does this mean for Donald Trump? What will...
Is Boris Johnson cherry picking data to control us?
by Shreya Dube• 14th November 2020
Shreya Dube unpicks the notorious cherry picking of COVID-19 data to dazzle the public ...
Why can’t we be friends? The political divide on-campus
by Oren Brown• 3rd November 2020
Oren Brown considers why it might be tricky to be friends with someone who has different political views...
Previous Story
Why you should vote for… the Green PartyNext Story
Politicians’ response to Australian bushfiresAbout the Author: Maud Webster