Dominic Cummings- er I mean, Boris Johnson has reshuffled his cabinet. In doing so, he has highlighted a structural flaw within the parliamentary system.
The UK does not have a presidential system, although Boris Johnson seems pretty determined to change that. An important difference between the two systems is scrutiny. When we cast a vote in the general election, the public did not vote for the country to be led by Boris Johnson, we voted for it to be led by the Conservative Party. In this cabinet reshuffle, Johnson hasn’t done a good job at reflecting that.
Johnson does not care about his ministers’ talents, only that they know how to say “yes”
The reshuffle saw Julian Smith – who was well liked in Northern Ireland – return to the backbenches Image: Wikimedia Commons
The day started off with the dismissal of Julian Smith, the previous Northern Ireland Secretary, presumably after Johnson and him clashed over Brexit negotiations. Smith had been credited with helping to get Stormont (the Northern Irish parliament) back up and running, after years of deadlock. The sacking therefore sent a clear message: Johnson does not care about your talents, he cares that you know how to say “yes”.
This was shown yet again with the treatment of Sajid Javid, the ex-Chancellor, who was asked to either replace his advisers with those selected by Johnson and Cummings, or leave. Looking at the historic role the Chancellor has in keeping the government in check, it is quite horrifying to see Javid – who did often stand up and openly disagree with the PM – replaced by the more loyal Rishi Sunak.
Who will keep Johnson in check if he replaces anybody who doesn’t tell him exactly what he wants to hear?
Who is meant to keep a Prime Minister with an eighty-strong majority in line? Who is going to tell him that what he’s doing is a mistake, if he’s so willing to replace anybody who doesn’t tell him exactly what he wants to hear? This all feels like it could develop into something very dangerous, or at least profoundly stupid. Reshuffles should help promote new talent within a party, not help the Prime Minister gain more power over that party. While Johnson is far from the first to abuse the system like this, he definitely highlights its flaws.
Boris Johnson has launched the ‘Lifetime Skills Guarantee’ during a visit to Exeter College on 29 September. The “massively accelerated” changes in the economy – one...
Cabinet reshuffle helps Johnson dodge scrutiny
Dominic Cummings- er I mean, Boris Johnson has reshuffled his cabinet. In doing so, he has highlighted a structural flaw within the parliamentary system.
The UK does not have a presidential system, although Boris Johnson seems pretty determined to change that. An important difference between the two systems is scrutiny. When we cast a vote in the general election, the public did not vote for the country to be led by Boris Johnson, we voted for it to be led by the Conservative Party. In this cabinet reshuffle, Johnson hasn’t done a good job at reflecting that.
Image: Wikimedia Commons
The day started off with the dismissal of Julian Smith, the previous Northern Ireland Secretary, presumably after Johnson and him clashed over Brexit negotiations. Smith had been credited with helping to get Stormont (the Northern Irish parliament) back up and running, after years of deadlock. The sacking therefore sent a clear message: Johnson does not care about your talents, he cares that you know how to say “yes”.
This was shown yet again with the treatment of Sajid Javid, the ex-Chancellor, who was asked to either replace his advisers with those selected by Johnson and Cummings, or leave. Looking at the historic role the Chancellor has in keeping the government in check, it is quite horrifying to see Javid – who did often stand up and openly disagree with the PM – replaced by the more loyal Rishi Sunak.
Who is meant to keep a Prime Minister with an eighty-strong majority in line? Who is going to tell him that what he’s doing is a mistake, if he’s so willing to replace anybody who doesn’t tell him exactly what he wants to hear? This all feels like it could develop into something very dangerous, or at least profoundly stupid. Reshuffles should help promote new talent within a party, not help the Prime Minister gain more power over that party. While Johnson is far from the first to abuse the system like this, he definitely highlights its flaws.
The view in favour of the reshuffle is available here: http://courierbackup.nusumoodle.co.uk/the-cabinet-reshuffle-looking-on-the-bright-side/
Share this article on:
accountability Boris Johnson cabinet reshuffle Conservatives dominic cummings Julian Smith Northern Ireland Rishi Sunak Sajid Javid Stormont
Last modified: 27th February 2020
You might also like
Johnson’s ‘green industrial revolution’ promises a lot, but is it enough?
by Maud Webster• 30th November 2020
Maud Webster analyses Boris Johnson's new Ten Point Plan for a Green Industrial Revolution, and considers whether it's enough to reach net-zero...
Gone today, here tomorrow? The Cummings controversy, Alistair Campbell, and the future of Special Advisors in Downing Street
by Emily Kelso• 29th November 2020
Emily Kelso on the future of Special Advisors in Downing Street...
Interview with Richard Holden MP
by Joe Molander• 21st November 2020
Joe Molander talks Brexit and Dominic Cummings with the MP for North West Durham...
Is Boris Johnson cherry picking data to control us?
by Shreya Dube• 14th November 2020
Shreya Dube unpicks the notorious cherry picking of COVID-19 data to dazzle the public ...
Boris Johnson unveils plan for ‘Lifetime Skills Guarantee’
by George Boatfield• 20th October 2020
Boris Johnson has launched the ‘Lifetime Skills Guarantee’ during a visit to Exeter College on 29 September. The “massively accelerated” changes in the economy – one...
The ultimate guide to your UK staycation
by Caitie Woolridge• 19th October 2020
Caitie ...
Previous Story
Political tensions in Venezuela: one year onNext Story
The cabinet reshuffle: looking on the bright side