It needs to be noted that, while it’s easy to blame technology for today’s problems, through history humans have consistently proved their ability to divide, with or without Facebook.
Legislators must not demonize the platforms as a whole, but rather understand their nuances and uses, and exploit their potential as informational tools.
Canadian law has been trying to control the use of social media campaigning during federal elections: in particular by demanding platforms to set up a digital ad registry. Nonetheless, the social media platform WeChat was able to target Chinese-Canadians with a campaign of misinformation. In fact, although WeChat has declared that they do not accept political ads on their platform, heavily deceiving messages have been allowed to advance the conservative agenda on the app.
In light of this development, it would be ingenuous to state that social media does not have an influence on elections. Yet, this is an issue that does not concern social media itself, but rather its uneducated misuse.
To some however, the mere concept of social media, whether in compliance with the law or not, is damaging to a functioning democracy.
They argue that targeted ads reinforce the division between different sides, to the point of users being enclosed in a “bubble” carefully crafted to support their views. However, it is not impossible to break out of this “bubble”.
For example, through the internet, it has never been easier to compare and contrast different news websites, or even participate in forums that do not reflect the user’s political views.
“In light of this, it can be argued that the problem is not in social media itself, but rather in people wanting to listen only to what they already believe.”
This instinct is not new. It used to happen through newspapers, with people preferring those who reflected their own political views, and it still happens with TV reporting.
While social media has been partly blamed for increasing levels of populism, the solution lays not in castigating the concept as a whole by reducing its influence, but rather in regulating its use, and educating users on how to use it most effectively.
Post Views:
2,074
canadian elections Conservative liberal misinformation polarization populism social media Technology
Last modified: 27th October 2019
Film Editor 19/20 and Law (LLB) graduate. An Italian passionate about journalism and the law: always up for a debate. @ElisabettaPul
Does social media sway public opinion in politics?
It needs to be noted that, while it’s easy to blame technology for today’s problems, through history humans have consistently proved their ability to divide, with or without Facebook.
Legislators must not demonize the platforms as a whole, but rather understand their nuances and uses, and exploit their potential as informational tools.
Canadian law has been trying to control the use of social media campaigning during federal elections: in particular by demanding platforms to set up a digital ad registry. Nonetheless, the social media platform WeChat was able to target Chinese-Canadians with a campaign of misinformation. In fact, although WeChat has declared that they do not accept political ads on their platform, heavily deceiving messages have been allowed to advance the conservative agenda on the app.
In light of this development, it would be ingenuous to state that social media does not have an influence on elections. Yet, this is an issue that does not concern social media itself, but rather its uneducated misuse.
To some however, the mere concept of social media, whether in compliance with the law or not, is damaging to a functioning democracy.
They argue that targeted ads reinforce the division between different sides, to the point of users being enclosed in a “bubble” carefully crafted to support their views. However, it is not impossible to break out of this “bubble”.
For example, through the internet, it has never been easier to compare and contrast different news websites, or even participate in forums that do not reflect the user’s political views.
This instinct is not new. It used to happen through newspapers, with people preferring those who reflected their own political views, and it still happens with TV reporting.
While social media has been partly blamed for increasing levels of populism, the solution lays not in castigating the concept as a whole by reducing its influence, but rather in regulating its use, and educating users on how to use it most effectively.
Share this article on:
canadian elections Conservative liberal misinformation polarization populism social media Technology
Last modified: 27th October 2019
You might also like
2020 breakthroughs: New electronic skin can feel pressure, temperature and pain
by Anna Green• 18th December 2020
Anna Green reflects on one of 2020's significant scientific breakthroughs ...
Letterboxd: Is it time to logoff logs?
by multiple writers• 1st December 2020
Is Letterboxd a fun sub-hobby for cinephiles or a pressure for productivity? Our writers discuss...
Interview with Richard Holden MP
by Joe Molander• 21st November 2020
Joe Molander talks Brexit and Dominic Cummings with the MP for North West Durham...
The viral influence of books written by social media stars
by Elizabeth Meade• 20th November 2020
Elizabeth Meade questions the viral influence of books written by social media stars....
The surprise album: a 21st century marketing technique
by Oren Brown• 16th November 2020
Oren Brown delves into the mystery behind surprise albums...
Conserving the conservation conversation: should Sir David pass the torch?
by Jon Deery• 16th November 2020
Jon Deery explores why David Attenborough's social media platform is important, and who should now take the mic...
Previous Story
Should buses to uni be free?Next Story
Trump withdraws from Paris Agreement, Accord-ing to SourcesAbout the Author: Elisabetta Pulcini