The President of America has caught COVID-19, showing how indiscriminate COVID is. Stay safe everyone! Given the fact that COVID is as terrible as it is, and the President is who he is, it raises the question does he and other politicians deserve sympathy in these situations? Well, my answer to that would be it is context dependent. However, in the case of the Commander-in-Chief across the pond, I truly believe sympathy from many people would be hard to find and be underserved.
Let me just say of course this isn’t wishing death upon anyone. The issue is whether sympathy is deserved for the President catching a virus that he has admitted to Bob Woodward on tape that he intentionally downplayed. The US has reached around 7.5 million infections, a number which would undoubtedly be lower if he had acted swiftly. I’d argue that sympathy would be last on the list of emotions for many, given the facts – and the facts are clear. I’ll take you through them briefly now to show that I’m not just some heartless man – that role indeed falls to the President!
The issue is whether sympathy is deserved for a President who has caught a vrius that he intentionally downplayed.
As evident with his X-Factor-esque performance returning to the White House, masks aren’t hot with the President, as he removed his almost immediately upon arrival, despite being infected. It is estimated that between 66,000-100,000 lives could potentially be saved in the US by December if everyone wore a mask in public. They are essential. A man who shows such little regard for this and then goes on to catch the virus can have very little complaints. The President has also continued to hold large, albeit outdoor, rallies for his campaign. This endangered people with no social distancing and set a dangerous precedent. A President is meant to lead by example. He also cut a pandemic early warning programme’s funding last September. It’s funny how these things work, isn’t it?
Further, Trump has continued to hold mega-rallies, and questioned the effectiveness of masks.
I could sit here all day telling you how much he has mishandled the virus but I won’t insult your intelligence. Politicians increasingly affect our lives. If a politician makes decisions that endanger our lives, with sympathy and empathy not even an afterthought, like we have in this case, why should we extend those feelings to them?
Post Views:
465
Coronavirus covid-19 politics Trump
Last modified: 24th October 2020
Trump doesn’t deserve any sympathy for catching COVID
The President of America has caught COVID-19, showing how indiscriminate COVID is. Stay safe everyone! Given the fact that COVID is as terrible as it is, and the President is who he is, it raises the question does he and other politicians deserve sympathy in these situations? Well, my answer to that would be it is context dependent. However, in the case of the Commander-in-Chief across the pond, I truly believe sympathy from many people would be hard to find and be underserved.
Let me just say of course this isn’t wishing death upon anyone. The issue is whether sympathy is deserved for the President catching a virus that he has admitted to Bob Woodward on tape that he intentionally downplayed. The US has reached around 7.5 million infections, a number which would undoubtedly be lower if he had acted swiftly. I’d argue that sympathy would be last on the list of emotions for many, given the facts – and the facts are clear. I’ll take you through them briefly now to show that I’m not just some heartless man – that role indeed falls to the President!
As evident with his X-Factor-esque performance returning to the White House, masks aren’t hot with the President, as he removed his almost immediately upon arrival, despite being infected. It is estimated that between 66,000-100,000 lives could potentially be saved in the US by December if everyone wore a mask in public. They are essential. A man who shows such little regard for this and then goes on to catch the virus can have very little complaints. The President has also continued to hold large, albeit outdoor, rallies for his campaign. This endangered people with no social distancing and set a dangerous precedent. A President is meant to lead by example. He also cut a pandemic early warning programme’s funding last September. It’s funny how these things work, isn’t it?
I could sit here all day telling you how much he has mishandled the virus but I won’t insult your intelligence. Politicians increasingly affect our lives. If a politician makes decisions that endanger our lives, with sympathy and empathy not even an afterthought, like we have in this case, why should we extend those feelings to them?
Share this article on:
Coronavirus covid-19 politics Trump
Last modified: 24th October 2020
You might also like
How I trained during Lockdown
by Emily Oakshott• 8th December 2020
In a very strange year, Emily Oakshott has had to adapt from a life of marathons in Paris to virtual races in Newcastle...
Qantas: Vaccination mandatory for international flights – Should airlines follow?
by Khanh Ngo• 7th December 2020
Khanh Ngo writes on Qantas' decision to require vaccination for COVID in order to fly with them, and the implications for the travel industry....
The year for Newcastle University in review
by Gemma Powell• 3rd December 2020
Gemma Powell looks back at the many trials and tribulations in 2020...
Jesmond venue forced to reschedule 24 events after coronavirus announcement
by Amelia Thorpe• 2nd December 2020
Amelia Thorpe talks about the impact of the UK government's new tier system upon local Newcastle music events....
Newcastle and Sussex Universities to use Lateral Flow Devices for COVID-19 testing
by Dominic Lee• 2nd December 2020
Only a few days before student COVID-19 testing begins, Dom Lee reports on the latest university news...
North East to benefit from shift in foreign investments
by Elsa Tarring• 1st December 2020
Elsa Tarring on the predicted rise of foreign investments in the North East ...
Previous Story
Pence and Harris offer little excitement in Vice-Presidential debateNext Story
Policy Review: Patel’s shocking policy proposals